Cited By
2022Applied Geochemistry: Vol. 143Comparing the adsorption of carbon dioxide and methane in Carboniferous shale from the Qaidam Basin, ChinaBing Cao, Qingchun Yuhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114651
2022Ecological Economics: Vol. 197Does Unconventional Energy Extraction Generate More Wastewater? A Lifetime PerspectiveMinhong Xu, Yilan Xu, Madhu Khannahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121261
2022Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering: Vol. 208The effect of paleo-environment on hydrocarbon generation potential: Example from Vaca Muerta Formation, Neuquén Basin, ArgentinaA. Małachowska, G.P. Lis, M. Mastalerz, F. Goodarzi, H. Saneihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120744
2022Fuel: Vol. 323Cost analysis of wastewater production from conventional and unconventional oil and gas wellsAshkan Zolfaghari, Joel Gehman, Daniel S. Alessihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12512
2022Arabian Journal of Geosciences: Vol. 15, Issue 5Geochemical characterization and hydrocarbon potential of Cambay Shale in the south Cambay Basin, India: implications to unconventional resource developmentSanjukta De, Aastha, Debashish Senguptahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124222
2021Economic InquiryCompensating communities for industrial disamenities: The case of shale gas developmentMax Harlemanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109342
2021GeoHealth: Vol. 5, Issue 6Natural Gas Gathering and Transmission Pipelines and Social Vulnerability in the United StatesRyan E. Emanuel, Martina A. Caretta, Louie Rivers, Pavithra Vasudevanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2118/201707-MS
2021Energy Reports: Vol. 7Permeability model for shale and ultra-tight gas formations: Critical insights into the impact of dynamic adsorptionClement Afagwu, Saad Alafnan, Mohamed A. Mahmoud, Shirish Patilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000442
2021SSRN Electronic Journal Commodities & SustainabilityNicolas Boccardhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12398-016-0181-8
2021Environmental Research Letters: Vol. 16, Issue 8Effect of subsidies and regulatory exemptions on 2020–2030 oil and gas production and profits in the United StatesPloy Achakulwisut, Peter Erickson, Doug Koplowhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0a10
2021Journal of King Saud University - Science: Vol. 33, Issue 8Cost-benefit analysis of shale development in India: A best-worst method based MCDM approachAbdul Razzaq Abdul Ghaffar, Md. Raghib Nadeem, Md. Gulzarul Hasanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101591
2021ACS Catalysis: Vol. 11, Issue 15Coke Deposition on Pt-Based Catalysts in Propane Direct Dehydrogenation: Kinetics, Suppression, and EliminationZan Lian, Chaowei Si, Faheem Jan, ShuaiKe Zhi, Bo Lihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c00331
2021Fuel: Vol. 297Unveiling stimulation fluid-driven alterations in shale pore architecture through combined interpretation of TD-NMR and multi-component gas adsorptionBryan X. Medina-Rodriguez, Vladimir Alvarado, Matthew Edgin, John Kaszubahttp://dx.doi.org/10.2118/209368-MS
2021Advances in Civil Engineering: Vol. 2021Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Shale under the Control of Bedding and Size: A Case Study of Shale from the Longmaxi Formation in ChinaYao Cheng, Yifeng Xie, Yulin Ma, Yanlin Zhao, Junhong Yuanhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6695263
2021Fuel: Vol. 303The impact of pore structure and adsorption behavior on kerogen tortuosityClement Afagwu, Saad Al-Afnan, Shirish Patil, Jaber Aljaberi, Mohamed A. Mahmoud, Jun Lihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.05.060
2021Energy & Fuels: Vol. 35, Issue 19A Review on the Role of Organic Matter in Gas Adsorption in ShaleTuli Bakshi, Vikram Vishalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2118/200008-MS
2020Applied Energy: Vol. 263A social, environmental and economic evaluation protocol for potential gas hydrate exploitation projectsDavid Riley, Marije Schaafsma, Héctor Marin-Moreno, Tim A. Minshullhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01631
2020Chemical Engineering Research and Design: Vol. 155A multi-layered view of chemical and biochemical engineeringRafiqul Gani, Jerzy Bałdyga, Béatrice Biscans, Elisabetta Brunazzi, Jean-Claude Charpentier, Enrico Drioli, Hermann Feise, Andrew Furlong, Kevin M. Van Geem, Jean-Charles de Hemptinne, Antoon J.B. ten Kate, Georgios M. Kontogeorgis, Flavio Manenti, Guy B. Marin, Seyed Soheil Mansouri, Patrick M. Piccione, Ana Povoa, Manuel Andres Rodrigo, Bent Sarup, Eva Sorensen, Isuru A. Udugama, John M. Woodleyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107436
2020Comptes Rendus. Chimie: Vol. 23, Issue 4-5A comparative technical and economic analysis of different processes for shale gas conversion to high value productsD. Duc Nguyen, Maryam Rahimi, Vahid Pirouzfar, Hossein Sakhaeinia, Chia-Hung Suhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2020.01.008
2020Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space: Vol. 38, Issue 4Making the subsurface political: How enhanced oil recovery techniques reshaped the energy transitionSébastien Chailleuxhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2399654419884077
2020Energy: Vol. 197Comparison between gasoline direct injection and compressed natural gas port fuel injection under maximum load conditionJeongwoo Lee, Cheolwoong Park, Jongwon Bae, Yongrae Kim, Sunyoup Lee, Changgi Kimhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117173
2020Applied Energy: Vol. 261Improved methods for determining effective sandstone reservoirs and evaluating hydrocarbon enrichment in petroliferous basinsWenyang Wang, Xiongqi Pang, Zhangxin Chen, Dongxia Chen, Xinhua Ma, Weiping Zhu, Tianyu Zheng, Keliu Wu, Kun Zhang, Kuiyou Mahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.465
2020Energy: Vol. 192Modeling the coal-to-gas switch potentials in the power sector: A case study of ChinaHao Chen, Hao-Peng Geng, Hui-Ting Ling, Song Peng, Nan Li, Shiwei Yu, Yi-Ming Weihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01553
2020Fuel: Vol. 259Slip length of methane flow under shale reservoir conditions: Effect of pore size and pressureYiling Nan, Wenhui Li, Zhehui Jinhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3854548
2019Microfluidics and Nanofluidics: Vol. 23, Issue 1Experimental study of gas flow characteristics in micro-/nano-pores in tight and shale reservoirs using microtubes under high pressure and low pressure gradientsXin Fang, Xiang’an Yue, Weiqing An, Xuegang Fenghttp://dx.doi.org/10.5802/crchim.30
2019ACS Catalysis: Vol. 9, Issue 9Opportunities and Challenges for Catalysis in Carbon Dioxide UtilizationMichael D. Burkart, Nilay Hazari, Cathy L. Tway, Elizabeth L. Zeitlerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105368
2019Science of The Total Environment: Vol. 691Flaring in two Texas shale areas: Comparison of bottom-up with top-down volume estimates for 2012 to 2015Katherine Ann Willyard, Gunnar W. Schadehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116237
2019Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research: Vol. 58, Issue 27Economic Model-Based Controller Design Framework for Hydraulic Fracturing To Optimize Shale Gas Production and Water UsageKaiyu Cao, Prashanth Siddhamshetty, Yuchan Ahn, Rajib Mukherjee, Joseph Sang-Il Kwonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13050
2016Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft: Vol. 40, Issue 3Lessons to Learn? Rückblick auf 10 Jahre „Schiefergasrevolution“ in den USA und Bestandsaufnahme für EuropaAndreas Seeligerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116629
2015Risk Analysis: Vol. 35, Issue 10Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception IssuesJohn D. Graham, John A. Rupp, Olga Schenkhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114457

 

© 2022 International Association for Energy Economics | Privacy Policy | Return Policy