Cited By
2020Energy Transitions: Vol. 4, Issue 1Analyzing the condition of Japanese electricity cost linkages by fossil fuel sources after the Fukushima disasterKentaka Aruga
2020Resource and Energy Economics: Vol. 59Considering the nuclear option: Hidden benefits and social costs of nuclear power in the U.S. since 1970David B. Adler, Akshaya Jha, Edson Severnini
2020Energy: Vol. 195The cost of a future low-carbon electricity system without nuclear power – the case of SwedenXiaoming Kan, Fredrik Hedenus, Lina Reichenberg
2019International Review of Public Administration: Vol. 24, Issue 1External shocks and policy change in different coalition opportunity structuresChanggeun Yun
2019der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management: Vol. 12, Issue 2-2019Konsensdemokratie und die Transformation der schweizerischen EnergiepolitikLorenz Kammermann, Rahel Freiburghaus
2018Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Vol. 81Energy sufficiency aspirations of India and the role of renewable resources: Scenarios for futureRhythm Singh
2018Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii series Environmental Management: Vol. 20, Issue 1Monitoring and caution - methods of increasing human reliability factorIvana Tureková
2017Energy Policy: Vol. 110Early nuclear retirements in deregulated U.S. markets: Causes, implications and policy optionsGeoffrey Haratyk
2017Nature Climate Change: Vol. 7, Issue 12Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategiesGokul Iyer, Catherine Ledna, Leon Clarke, James Edmonds, Haewon McJeon, Page Kyle, James H Williams
2017Energy Economics: Vol. 64Strategic real option and flexibility analysis for nuclear power plants considering uncertainty in electricity demand and public acceptanceMichel-Alexandre Cardin, Sizhe Zhang, William J. Nuttall
2017Energy Research & Social Science: Vol. 27Anatomy of a black sheep: The roots of the Czech Republic’s pro-nuclear energy policyJan Osička, Filip Černoch
2016Journal of Applied Social Psychology: Vol. 46, Issue 4Reconciling nuclear risk: the impact of the Fukushima accident on comparative preferences for nuclear power in U.K. electricity generationChristopher R. Jones, Herman Elgueta, J. Richard Eiser
2016Energy Policy: Vol. 91The effect of economic growth, oil prices, and the benefits of reactor standardization: Duration of nuclear power plant construction revisitedZsuzsanna Csereklyei, Paul W. Thurner, Alexander Bauer, Helmut Küchenhoff
2016Communication, Culture & Critique: Vol. 9, Issue 3Beyond Disaster and Risk: Post-Fukushima Nuclear News in U.S. and German PressDavid J. Park, Weirui Wang, Juliet Pinto
2016The Energy Journal: Vol. 37, Issue 3What Moves the Ex Post Variable Profit of Natural-Gas-Fired Generation in California?Chi-Keung Woo Ira Horowitz, Jay Zarnikau, Jack Moore, Brendan Schneiderman, Tony Ho, Eric Leung Eric Leung
2016Energy: Vol. 100Endogenizing the probability of nuclear exit in an optimal power-generation mix modelTakanobu Kosugi
2015The Energy Journal: Vol. 36, Issue 3Nuclear Capacity AuctionsSven-Olof Fridolfsson, Thomas P. Tangeras
2014Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy: Vol. 3, Issue 2Germany�s Nuclear Phase Out - A Survey of the Impact since 2011 and Outlook to 2023Friedrich Kunz, Hannes Weigt
2014SSRN Electronic Journal A Vision of the European Energy Future? The Impact of the German Response to the Fukushima EarthquakeLuigi Grossi, Sven Heim, Michael Waterson
2013SSRN Electronic JournalUranium and Nuclear Power: The Role of Exploration Information in Framing Public PolicyCharles F. Mason
2013SSRN Electronic JournalUranium and Nuclear Power: The Role of Exploration Information in Framing Public PolicyCharles F. Mason
2013Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Vol. 69, Issue 2Nuclear exit, the US energy mix, and carbon dioxide emissionsHenry D. Jacoby, Sergey Paltsev
2012Energy Policy: Vol. 51Divestiture of TEPCO for reparation for the Fukushima nuclear accident–A path to vertical unbundlingNobuhiro Hosoe, Makoto Tanaka


© 2021 International Association for Energy Economics | Privacy Policy | Return Policy