Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Twitter
Shop
Cited By
2018Applied Sciences: Vol. 8, Issue 3A Novel Distributed Large-Scale Demand Response Scheme in High Proportion Renewable Energy Sources Integration Power SystemsJay Zarnikau, Dan Thalhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9169-9
2017Energy Policy: Vol. 102A field study using an adaptive in-house pricing model for commercial and industrial customers in KoreaShuai Fan, Guangyu He, Kunqi Jia, Zhihua Wanghttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841049
2016Energy Efficiency: Vol. 9, Issue 3Power-use profile analysis of non-domestic consumers for electricity tariff switchinghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.04.004
2016SSRN Electronic Journal Behavioral Considerations for Effective Time-Varying Electricity PricesWai Hong Choi, Anindya Sen, Adam Whitehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385134-5.00011-9
2015Applied Energy: Vol. 147Strategies to mitigate declines in the economic value of wind and solar at high penetration in CaliforniaIan Schneider, Cass R. Sunsteinhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04717-1_2
2014Applied Energy: Vol. 114A review of electricity product differentiationRamon Granell, Colin J. Axon, David C. H. Wallom, Russell L. Layberryhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app8030452
2013Utilities Policy: Vol. 26The response of large industrial energy consumers to four coincident peak (4CP) transmission charges in the Texas (ERCOT) marketC.K. Woo, P. Sreedharan, J. Hargreaves, F. Kahrl, J. Wang, I. Horowitzhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.024
2011Journal of Regulatory Economics: Vol. 40, Issue 3Response of industrial customers to hourly pricing in Ontario’s deregulated electricity marketMin-Jeong Kimhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.014