Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Twitter
Cited By
2013Climate Policy: Vol. 13, Issue 3Can no-lose targets contribute to a 2°C target?Vicki Duscha, Joachim Schleichhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.763529
2012Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change: Vol. 17, Issue 7Oil price scenarios and climate policy: welfare effects of including transportation in the EU emissions trading systemAsbjørn Torvanger, Steffen Kallbekken, Petter Tollefsenhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9342-6
2009Resource and Energy Economics: Vol. 31, Issue 1The clean development mechanism versus international permit trading: The effect on technological changeCathrine Hagemhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.10.002
2008Ecological Economics: Vol. 66, Issue 2-3The monetary compensation mechanism: An alternative to the clean development mechanismXuemei Liuhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.003
2007Climate Policy: Vol. 7, Issue 3Why the CDM will reduce carbon leakageSTEFFEN KALLBEKKENhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685649
2007Energy Policy: Vol. 35, Issue 8CDM baseline approaches and carbon leakageSteffen Kallbekken, Line S. Flottorp, Nathan Rivehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.013
2006Environmental & Resource Economics: Vol. 34, Issue 2Market Power with Interdependent Demand: Sale of Emission Permits and Natural Gas from RussiaCathrine Hagem, Steffen Kallbekken, Ottar Mæstad, Hege Westskoghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6206-0
2006Global Environmental Change: Vol. 16, Issue 2Climate agreements based on responsibility for global warming: Periodic updating, policy choices, and regional costsNathan Rive, Asbjørn Torvanger, Jan S. Fuglestvedthttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.01.002