Cited By
2020Energy Policy: Vol. 146Four reasons why there is so much confusion about energy efficiencyTian Goh, B.W. Anghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00014-6
2019Sustainability: Vol. 11, Issue 3Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression ApproachChao Bi, Minna Jia, Jingjing Zenghttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11030629
2017Energy Economics: Vol. 67Has energy efficiency performance improved in China?—non-energy sectors evidence from sequenced hybrid energy use tablesKaiyao Wu, Jiyuan Shi, Tinggan Yanghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.010
2015Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: Vol. 47Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approachesSteve Sorrellhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002
2015Energy Economics: Vol. 51A harmonized calculation model for transforming EU bottom-up energy efficiency indicators into empirical estimates of policy impactsMarvin J. Horowitz, Paolo Bertoldihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.12.004
2010Sustainability: Vol. 2, Issue 6Energy, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: Five PropositionsSteven Sorrellhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su2061784
2007Energy Economics: Vol. 29, Issue 4Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mixNa Liu, B.W. Anghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230583108_1
2005Energy Policy: Vol. 33, Issue 2The measurement of the energy intensity of manufacturing industries: a principal components analysisJean-Thomas Bernard, Bruno Côtéhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00220-9
1999Energy Economics: Vol. 21, Issue 5Defining ‘total energy use’ in economic studies: does the aggregation approach matter?Jay Zarnikauhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230583108_7

 

© 2022 International Association for Energy Economics | Privacy Policy | Return Policy