Facebook LinkedIn Instagram Twitter
Cited By
2020Fuel: Vol. 259Slip length of methane flow under shale reservoir conditions: Effect of pore size and pressureYiling Nan, Wenhui Li, Zhehui Jinhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116237
2019ACS Catalysis: Vol. 9, Issue 9Opportunities and Challenges for Catalysis in Carbon Dioxide UtilizationMichael D. Burkart, Nilay Hazari, Cathy L. Tway, Elizabeth L. Zeitlerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2118/187297-PA
2019Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research: Vol. 58, Issue 27Economic Model-Based Controller Design Framework for Hydraulic Fracturing To Optimize Shale Gas Production and Water UsageKaiyu Cao, Prashanth Siddhamshetty, Yuchan Ahn, Rajib Mukherjee, Joseph Sang-Il Kwonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01553
2019Science of The Total Environment: Vol. 691Flaring in two Texas shale areas: Comparison of bottom-up with top-down volume estimates for 2012 to 2015Katherine Ann Willyard, Gunnar W. Schadehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40124-9_16
2018SPE Journal: Vol. 23, Issue 05The Density of Oil/Gas Mixtures: Insights From Molecular SimulationsMohamed Mehana, Mashhad Fahes, Liangliang Huanghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.465
2016Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft: Vol. 40, Issue 3Lessons to Learn? Rückblick auf 10 Jahre „Schiefergasrevolution“ in den USA und Bestandsaufnahme für EuropaAndreas Seeligerhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12398-016-0181-8
2015Risk Analysis: Vol. 35, Issue 10Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception IssuesJohn D. Graham, John A. Rupp, Olga Schenkhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12512