Facebook LinkedIn Youtube Twitter
Shop

IAEE Members and subscribers to The Energy Journal: Please log in to access the full text article or receive discounted pricing for this article.

When a National Cap-and-Trade Policy with Carve-out Provision May Be Preferable to a National CO2 Tax

Abstract:
We analyze the effect of various combinations of state and national emissions policies on national emissions of a global pollutant, specifically, greenhouse gas emissions. We highlight the effect of unintended increases in out-of-state emissions on the efficacy of overlapping state policies. We show that emission taxes do not necessarily prevent a completely offsetting increase in out-of-state emissions when states add a state-level emissions tax to the national emissions tax. In particular, states small relative to their market will be unable to reduce national emissions with a state-level CO2 tax or a system of tradable permits. However, under a national cap-and-trade regime that allows states to be carved out, a state of any size can reduce national emissions by setting a tighter state cap. This combination yields a lower total cost than the equivalent combination of national and state CO2 taxes (if one exists) but increases the cost to consumers outside the market.

Download Executive Summary Download PDF



JEL Codes: Q54: Climate; Natural Disasters and Their Management; Global Warming, Q42: Alternative Energy Sources, Q41: Energy: Demand and Supply; Prices, Q52: Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects

Keywords: Electricity, Tax, Tradable permits, Nested regulations, Renewable energy, Emissions, Climate change

DOI: 10.5547/01956574.36.3.macc

References: Reference information is available for this article. Join IAEE, log in, or purchase the article to view reference data.


Published in Volume 36, Number 3 of the bi-monthly journal of the IAEE's Energy Economics Education Foundation.