IAEE Members and subscribers to The Energy Journal: Please log in to access the full text article or receive discounted pricing for this article.

Climate Policies: A Burden, or a Gain?

That climate policies are costly is evident and therefore often create major fears. But the alternative (no action) also has a cost. Therefore, mitigation costs netted of the damage costs avoided are the only figure that can seriously be considered as the "genuine cost" of a policy. We elaborate on this view of a policy's cost by distinguishing between its "direct" cost component and its avoided damage cost component; we then confront the two so as to evaluate its genuine cost. As damages avoided are equivalent to the benefits generated, this brings climate policies naturally in the realm of benefit-cost analysis. However, the sheer benefit-cost criterion may not be a sufficient incentive for a country to be induced to cooperate internationally, a necessary condition for an effective global climate policy. We therefore also explore how to make use of this criterion in the context of international climate cooperation.

Download Executive Summary Purchase ( $25 )

JEL Codes: Q54: Climate; Natural Disasters and Their Management; Global Warming, Q58: Environmental Economics: Government Policy, G38: Corporate Finance and Governance: Government Policy and Regulation

Keywords: Climate policy, Integrated assessment models, Benefit-cost analysis, International cooperation

DOI: 10.5547/01956574.36.3.tbre

References: Reference information is available for this article. Join IAEE, log in, or purchase the article to view reference data.

Published in Volume 36, Number 3 of the bi-monthly journal of the IAEE's Energy Economics Education Foundation.


© 2021 International Association for Energy Economics | Privacy Policy | Return Policy